THE COMPARATIVE METHOD IN GLOBALISED CRIMINOLOGY


THE COMPARATIVE METHOD IN GLOBALISED CRIMINOLOGY

Abstract

Traditional comparative criminology has predominantly focused on the comparison of isolated and self-contained cultures and arrangements. However, globalisation has altered states of isolation and self-containment to produce spheres of interrelation. That provides a challenge to the comparative method. This article will argue that comparative criminology needs to come to terms with novel objects in new conceptual and organisational layers, both above the state and below the city. Such enquiry requires agility. Rather than identifying and crossing new frontiers, globalised comparative criminology should concern itself with the complex interplay between global, national, city and subcity levels. This approach is illustrated by an examination of contrasts in community safety between the rival Dutch cities of Amsterdam and Rotterdam.

References
Aas, Katja F. (2007), Globalisation and crime. Los Angeles: Sage.
Alexander J.C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In Alexander J.C., Eyserman R., Giesen B., Smelser N.J., Sztompka P. (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 1–30). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Crossref
Barak G. (2000). Comparative criminology: A global view. The Critical Criminologist, 10, 2.
Bayley D.H. (1996). Policing: The world stage. In Mawby R. (Ed.), Policing across the world.(pp. 3–12). London: Routledge.
Beirne P. (1983). Cultural relativism and comparative criminology. Contemporary Crisis, 7, 371–391.
Beirne P., Nelken D. (Eds.). (1997). Issues in comparative criminology, Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.
Cavadino M., Dignan J. (2006). Penal systems: A comparative approach. London: Sage.
Cain M. (2000). Through other eyes: On the limitations and values of Western criminology for teaching and practice in Trinidad and Tobago. In Nelken D. (Ed.), Contrasting criminal justice: Getting from here to there. (pp. 265–93). Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.
Downes D. (1988). Contrasts in tolerance. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Durkheim E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. New York: The Free Press
Edwards A., Hughes G. (2005). Comparing the governance of safety in Europe: A geo-historical approach. Theoretical Criminology, 9, 345–363. Abstract
Engbersen G., Snel E., Weltevrede A. (2005). Sociale herverovering in Amsterdam en Rotterdam: Een verhaal over twee wijken. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Franke H. (1990). Dutch tolerance: Fact and fables. British Journal of Criminology, 30(1), 81–93.
De Haan W. (2007). Morele paniek of cultureel trauma? Over de betekenis en de gevolgen van de moord op Theo van Gogh. Tijdschrift voor criminologie, 49, 252–264.
Hardie-Bick J., Sheptycki J., Wardak A. (2005). Introduction: Transnational and comparative criminology in a global perspective. In Sheptycki J., Wardak A. (Eds.), Transnational & comparative criminology (pp. 1–16). London: Glasshouse.
Hayward K. (2004). Space—The final frontier: Criminology, the City and the spatial dynamics of exclusion. In Ferrell J., Hayward K., Morrison W., Presdee M. (Eds.), Cultural criminology unleashed (pp. 155–66). London: Glasshouse.
Heidensohn F. (2004). Finding new frontiers to cross in criminology. In Winterdyk J., Cao L. (Eds.), Lessons from international/comparative criminology/criminal justice (pp. 154–69). Willowdale, Canada: De Sitter.
Heidensohn F. (2006). Contrasts and concepts: Considering the development of comparative criminology. In Newburn T. (Ed.), The politics of crime control (pp. 173–96). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Heidensohn F. (2007). International comparative research in criminology. In King R., Wincup E. (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 199–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hodgson J. (2000). Comparing legal cultures: The comparatist as participant observer. In Nelken D. (Ed.), Contrasting criminal justice: Getting from here to there (pp. 139–56). Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.
Mead M. (1977). Letters from the field. New York: Harper.
McDonald W.F. (1997). Crime and justice in the global village: Towards global criminology. In McDonald W.F. (Ed.), Crime and law enforcement in the global village (pp. 3–21). Cincinnati. OH: Anderson.
Nelken D. (2000). Contrasting criminal justice: Getting from here to there. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
Nelken D. (2009). Comparative criminal justice: Beyond enthocentrism and relativism. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 291–311. Abstract
Ombudsman van Rotterdam. (2007). Baas in eigen huis: ‘Tja wij komen eigenlijk voor alles’. Rotterdam: Ombudsman van Rotterdam.
Pakes F. (2004). The politics of discontent: The emergence of a new criminal justice discourse in the Netherlands. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 284–98. Globalised
Pakes F. (2006). The ebb and flow of criminal justice in the Netherlands. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 34, 141–156. Globalised
Pakes F. (2010). Comparative criminal justice (2nd ed.). Cullompton: Willan. Globalised
Sheptycki J. (2005). Relativism transnationalism and comparative criminology. In Sheptycki J., Wardak A. (Eds.), Transnational & Comparative criminology (pp. 69–88;). London: Glasshouse.
Stenson K., Edwards A. (2004). Policy transfer in local crime control: Beyond naíve emulation. In Newburn T., Sparks R. (Eds.), Criminal justice and political cultures: National and international dimensions of crime control (pp. 209 233). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
Uitermark J. (2006, March). Grootstedelijke cijferpolitiek: Rotterdam na vier jaar niet leefbaarder dan Amsterdam. Tijdschrift voor de sociale sector, 34–39.
Schama S. (1986).The embarrassment of riches: An interpretation of Dutch culture in the Golden Age. New York: Vintage. Globalised
Tops P. (2007). Regimeverandering in Rotterdam: Hoe een stadsbestuur zichzelf opnieuw uitvond Amsterdam: Atlas.
Vagg J. (1983). Context and linkage: Reflections on comparative research and ‘internationalism’ in criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 33, 541–554.
van den Brink G. (2002). Politiek moeilijker of mondiger; een studie naar de politieke habitus van Nederlandse burger, Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. Voorstudie no 115. Den Haag: Sdu.
van Swaaningen R. (2007a). Naar een kosmopolitische criminologie. In van de Bunt H., Spierenburg P., van Swaaningen R. (Eds.), Drie perspectieven op sociale controle (pp. 17–65) The Hague: Boom.
van Swaaningen R. (2007b). Sweeping the street: Civil society and community safety in Rotterdam. In Shapland J. (Ed.), Justice, community and civil society: A contested terrain (pp. 87–106). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
Wanders J. (2008, October 9). Wat moet Rotterdam met de spierballentaal van de Coolsingel? Volkskrant, 2008. Available on line at http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article1075744.ece/Wat_moet_Rotterdam_met_de_spierballentaal_van_de_Coolsingel
Young J. (1999). The exclusive society, London: Sage.
Young J. (2004). Voodoo criminology and the numbers game. In Ferrell J., Hayward K., Morrison W., Presdee M. (Eds), Cultural criminology unleashed. London: Glasshouse Press.
Young J. (2008). The vertigo of late modernity. London: Sage.
Zedner L. (1995). Comparative research in criminal justice. In Noaks L., Levi M., Maguire M. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in criminology (pp. 8–25). Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.

 

Get the Complete Project (NOW)

Leave a Reply

Like
  • You are in the Right Place. Success Project is waiting to help!
  • If you have any Issue, click the contact menu to get strainght to us
  • OR simply call a Desk Officer on 08175212731 or 08142863125